Methodology

We show our work.

Reports become signals through transparent rules. This page explains the inputs, weighting, and trade-offs behind each company status.

01

Reports, not reviews

Every entry is a single observable event: silence, a reply, a fake listing, or a hostile interaction. There are no star ratings or long-form reviews.

02

Statistics, not impressions

Rates use Wilson lower bounds so a single bad day doesn't repaint a company. Small sample sizes are visible as smaller numbers, not louder ones.

03

Decay, not permanence

Reports lose weight over time. A team that ghosted in 2022 and responds consistently today can recover, and the page reflects that change.

What counts as a report

A report is a structured observation tied to a specific application or interview. It records four things: which company, what happened (ghosted, replied, ran a fake role, behaved badly), how long the silence lasted when relevant, and an optional comment. Personal identifiers are stripped before storage; we keep only what is needed to compute the numbers.

Reports are tied to a fingerprint, not an identity. One person, one report per company per cycle. Duplicate or near-duplicate submissions are merged.

How we score a company

Two raw rates do most of the work: ghost rate (silent outcomes ÷ total reports) and response rate (replies ÷ total reports). Both are wrapped in a Wilson lower bound at 95% so that a company with three reports cannot outrank a company with three hundred just by being unlucky early.

On top of that we apply a toxicity penalty. Reports of hostile interactions or fake roles count more than a missed reply. A company can be technically responsive and still land in red if the responses themselves are the problem.

The four verdicts

A verdict never appears without an icon and a number next to it. Color alone is not allowed to do the talking.

How we age the data

Each report keeps its submission timestamp. Rates use an 18-month half-life: a report from 18 months ago carries about half the weight of a report from last week. Hiring teams and processes change, so older reports gradually carry less influence.

Moderation

Every report enters a review queue. Approved reports become public on the leaderboard and the recent feed. Reports that look like spam, defamation, or personal attacks are rejected and never count toward a score.

Comments are optional and lightly edited for clarity and safety. We never publish names, contact details, or identifying claims about individual employees.

What this is not

Corrections

Companies and applicants can both flag a report for review. If a report is wrong, we remove it; if a verdict is stale, the decay handles it. Email corrections@ghostcheck.net with the slug and the reason.

Methodology v1.0 · last reviewed this quarter.